But some key Republicans are wondering why it took so long before every resident was advised to drink bottled water. That was the rub of a legislative hearing today.
Before Gov. Whitmer came into office in January of 2019, the outgoing Rick Snyder administration warned the residents of Benton Harbor that there was a lead in the water problem.
And when she became governor the state environmental department in March of 2019 treated the water with chemicals to get rid of the lead and water filters were recommended, but that did not solve the problem.
And in February of 2020, a revised chemical treatment program was started which is "showing some improvement."
When the city recently failed for the sixth time to get the lead out, the governor ordered bottled water for everyone and set a target of 18 months to remove all the lead pipes.
"In response to that health risk, Governor Whitmer signed an executive directive last week to ensure a full government approach to access to safe drinking water right now," said Liesl Clark, director of EGLE. "And we'll work to replace very lead pipe in Benton Harbor as soon as possible.
But the GOP oversight committee chair Steven Johnson and kept asking why did it take three years for the governor to get to that point?
"This started three years ago. we've had six reports in a row about lead levels that are high and yet it seems like this just ramped up a lot in the last 30 days," he said.
The Benton Harbor Mayor Marcus Muhammad reports in 2019, he asked the Whitmer Administration for more money after the state gave the city $300,000. And the Republicans claim her response has been tardy.
But Bishop Adam Berry, a community leader, defends the governor and says the debate is should not be about the past.
"I believe the governor is doing the best she can," Berry said. "We need the leaders to stand up and say we don't have time to talk about how we got here, we need to know where we're going."
Some Republicans do want to look at the past so that this does not happen again.
And when asked what the state might have done differently given hindsight, Clark offered this..
"I don't have a full situational awareness right now to answer that question. That is something our team is thinking through," she said.
The state allocated $10 million recently to remove the pipes and the lawmakers are debating another $11 million on top of that.